<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did you start out photography with film or digital ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html</link>
	<description>The place to learn digital photography online using your point and shoot camera.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:03:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html#comment-103</guid>
		<description>I started with a Kodak box brownie 127bw film in the early 50&#039;s taking ghost photos of my brother under a sheet by double exposure   Unfortunately all my early photo&#039;s were thrown out. grrrrr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started with a Kodak box brownie 127bw film in the early 50&#8217;s taking ghost photos of my brother under a sheet by double exposure   Unfortunately all my early photo&#8217;s were thrown out. grrrrr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/comment-page-1#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html#comment-102</guid>
		<description>i started out with a little digital camera , then i had a film class and became amazed @ how i could develop my own film so i stuck with that for a long time but now im back to digital

both are great in my opinion sometimes one just works better with what you&#039;re wanting to shoot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i started out with a little digital camera , then i had a film class and became amazed @ how i could develop my own film so i stuck with that for a long time but now im back to digital</p>
<p>both are great in my opinion sometimes one just works better with what you&#8217;re wanting to shoot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AGK</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/comment-page-1#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>AGK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html#comment-101</guid>
		<description>There was no digital at the time. So film. I only got a digital camera a few years ago. Well to be completely honest it was actually a phone, anyway the easy handling of digital files was good even though the quality was horrible. Anyway the poor quality finally convinced me to move to a proper digital camera and that was that. I still have a 30 something year old film camera and a 10 year old one as well and I use them both, but digital is just as fun in different ways, especially when you need to do things quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no digital at the time. So film. I only got a digital camera a few years ago. Well to be completely honest it was actually a phone, anyway the easy handling of digital files was good even though the quality was horrible. Anyway the poor quality finally convinced me to move to a proper digital camera and that was that. I still have a 30 something year old film camera and a 10 year old one as well and I use them both, but digital is just as fun in different ways, especially when you need to do things quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMG, I ♥ PONIES!!1</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/comment-page-1#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>OMG, I ♥ PONIES!!1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html#comment-100</guid>
		<description>I started with film. To be more specific, a Nikon EM in about 1985. It had no aperture priority mode, no auto-focus, no automatic film advance, no nothing. And despite the Nikon badge it was cheaply built, so it wasn’t even good for clubbing them pesky dinosaurs that still roamed the streets back then. As the years went on, I added items.

My first digital camera was a Nikon Coolpix 8700 in 2004. It produced nice images but its limitations compared to an SLR drove me up the wall. In 2006 I upgraded to a Nikon D200. To me, that was the first “affordable” digital camera that was good enough to retire my film gear. I took the D200 on a round-the-world trip in 2007-8 and wore it every day with a heavy zoom lens attached. My back still hurts, but I got some great images!

And just this week I’m getting back into film. A few days ago I bought a 1968 Agfa Silette LK for $5. It’s a fixed lens little thing that slides into a coat pocket. What a great feeling to have a tiny camera again! So yesterday I upped the ante and bought a Canonet QL17 G3 for $75 on eBay.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the Canonet became my main camera due to the small form factor. With a fixed 35mm f/1.7 lens it’s great for street photography. And unlike any digital point &amp; shoot, a film camera is responsive and with f/2 you can blur the crap out of the background.

I was saving my pennies for a Nikon D700 to replace my D200. I almost did, actually. But if this Canonet turns me onto rangefinders I might rethink that. I’m more of a gear head than I should be – reading up on every development and spending way too much cash on gear – but really, I’m happy with any old camera and an interesting location. The older and cheaper the gear, the more thought/ effort/ skill it takes to get great shots... which is not necessarily a bad thing.

Fun question, by the way. I enjoyed reading the other answers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started with film. To be more specific, a Nikon EM in about 1985. It had no aperture priority mode, no auto-focus, no automatic film advance, no nothing. And despite the Nikon badge it was cheaply built, so it wasn’t even good for clubbing them pesky dinosaurs that still roamed the streets back then. As the years went on, I added items.</p>
<p>My first digital camera was a Nikon Coolpix 8700 in 2004. It produced nice images but its limitations compared to an SLR drove me up the wall. In 2006 I upgraded to a Nikon D200. To me, that was the first “affordable” digital camera that was good enough to retire my film gear. I took the D200 on a round-the-world trip in 2007-8 and wore it every day with a heavy zoom lens attached. My back still hurts, but I got some great images!</p>
<p>And just this week I’m getting back into film. A few days ago I bought a 1968 Agfa Silette LK for $5. It’s a fixed lens little thing that slides into a coat pocket. What a great feeling to have a tiny camera again! So yesterday I upped the ante and bought a Canonet QL17 G3 for $75 on eBay.</p>
<p>I wouldn’t be surprised if the Canonet became my main camera due to the small form factor. With a fixed 35mm f/1.7 lens it’s great for street photography. And unlike any digital point &#038; shoot, a film camera is responsive and with f/2 you can blur the crap out of the background.</p>
<p>I was saving my pennies for a Nikon D700 to replace my D200. I almost did, actually. But if this Canonet turns me onto rangefinders I might rethink that. I’m more of a gear head than I should be – reading up on every development and spending way too much cash on gear – but really, I’m happy with any old camera and an interesting location. The older and cheaper the gear, the more thought/ effort/ skill it takes to get great shots&#8230; which is not necessarily a bad thing.</p>
<p>Fun question, by the way. I enjoyed reading the other answers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian_rmsy</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/comment-page-1#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>brian_rmsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I started off with a charcoal and a cave wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started off with a charcoal and a cave wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: troubledwolf</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/comment-page-1#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>troubledwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Its Complicated, really.

Being born in the early 1990s, It natural that at some point that A film camera  fell into my hands. As much as I hate it, I think I actually &quot;Started photography&quot; with a point and shoot digital  and then took off with the purchase of my beloved N80 Film SLR in 2008.

Thank you for asking this question, Anna. It brings back fond memories of me opening those first borrowed issues of popular photography magazine right when they started to debate the newly emerged digital VS film all those years ago...I had sided with film...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its Complicated, really.</p>
<p>Being born in the early 1990s, It natural that at some point that A film camera  fell into my hands. As much as I hate it, I think I actually &#8220;Started photography&#8221; with a point and shoot digital  and then took off with the purchase of my beloved N80 Film SLR in 2008.</p>
<p>Thank you for asking this question, Anna. It brings back fond memories of me opening those first borrowed issues of popular photography magazine right when they started to debate the newly emerged digital VS film all those years ago&#8230;I had sided with film&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/comment-page-1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t this question be in Polls &amp; Surveys?  Isn&#039;t it really just another way to ask, &quot;How old are you anyway?&quot;

(haha!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t this question be in Polls &#038; Surveys?  Isn&#8217;t it really just another way to ask, &#8220;How old are you anyway?&#8221;</p>
<p>(haha!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: φωτογράφος</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/comment-page-1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>φωτογράφος</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html#comment-96</guid>
		<description>theres a difference???

started on 35mm, grew up to 60mm x 70mm, now its mostly digi and rearly film if large copy is required, when it is film its large from the Camo nowadays</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theres a difference???</p>
<p>started on 35mm, grew up to 60mm x 70mm, now its mostly digi and rearly film if large copy is required, when it is film its large from the Camo nowadays</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teri</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/comment-page-1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Teri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Film was the only option when I started.  I do only digital now though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Film was the only option when I started.  I do only digital now though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html/comment-page-1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointandshootshutterbug.com/did-you-start-out-photography-with-film-or-digital.html#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Just graduated high school. I started by taking a photo class in school that utilized film and then went from there. It really helped me learn about how a camera works compared to just using a regular point and shoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just graduated high school. I started by taking a photo class in school that utilized film and then went from there. It really helped me learn about how a camera works compared to just using a regular point and shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
